07 اردیبهشت 1403

علی صابری مهر

مرتبه علمی: دانشیار
نشانی: بناب-دانشگاه بناب
تحصیلات: دکترای تخصصی / مهندسی مکانیک
تلفن: 04137745000
دانشکده: دانشکده فنی و مهندسی
گروه: گروه مهندسی مکانیک

مشخصات پژوهش

عنوان
Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source
نوع پژوهش مقاله چاپ شده
کلیدواژه‌ها
Trilateral cycle ORC Kalina cycle Ammonia-water Exergoeconomic Low-grade heat source
پژوهشگران مرتضی یاری (نفر اول)، علی صابری مهر (نفر دوم)، وحید زارع (نفر سوم)، سید محمد سید محمودی (نفر چهارم)، Marc A. Rosen (نفر پنجم)

چکیده

Recently, the TLC (trilateral power cycle) has attracted significant interest as it provides better matching between the temperature profiles in the evaporator compared to conventional power cycles. This article investigates the performance of this cycle and compares it with those for the ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and the Kalina cycle, from the viewpoints of thermodynamics and thermoeconomics. A low-grade heat source with a temperature of 120 C is considered for all the three systems. Parametric studies are performed for the systems for several working fluids in the ORC and TLC. The systems are then optimized for either maximum net output power or minimum product cost, using the EES (engineering equation solver) software. The results for the TLC indicate that an increase in the expander inlet temperature leads to an increase in net output power and a decrease in product cost for this power plant, whereas this is not the case for the ORC system. It is found that, although the TLC can achieve a higher net output power compared with the ORC and Kalina (KCS11 (Kalina cycle system 11)) systems, its product cost is greatly affected by the expander isentropic efficiency. It is also revealed that using n-butane as the working fluid can result in the lowest product cost in the ORC and the TLC. In addition, it is observed that, for both the ORC and Kalina systems, the optimum operating condition for maximum net output power differs from that for minimum product cost.