This study investigates the relative effectiveness of online dynamic assessment (DA)
compared to the teacher’s explicit feedback in the acquisition of requests in an online
learning environment. Thirty-four intermediate-level English as a foreign language
(EFL) learners were randomly assigned to three groups: expert peer DA (PDA),
teacher DA (TDA), and teacher’s explicit feedback (TEF). Following the
metapragmatic instruction, the participants were provided with 15 discourse
completion tests (three treatment sessions, five items for each session) to complete.
Discourse completion tests depicted request scenarios and required the participants
to write what they would say in those situations. The participants worked
independently, and when the DA groups created poorly constructed requests, they
were given online pre-established mediational hints. These hints were arranged from
the most implicit to the most explicit, and were provided by either an expert peer (for
the PDA group) or the teacher (for the TDA group). The TEF group, on the other
hand, received the teacher’s explicit feedback on any pragmatic deviations. The
analysis of the pretest and post-test scores by series of t-tests and an ANCOVA
showed that the best performance belonged to the PDA group, followed by TDA and
TEF groups. The findings underscore the pedagogical value of DA and the superiority
of expert peers’ mediation over teacher mediation in the development of L2
pragmatic competence.